søndag, juli 17, 2005

Irak og al Qaeda

Der er før kommet en del information ud, der påpeger at Irak og al Qaeda havde en del samarbejde op igennem 1990´erne, om end ikke omkring 11. September. Den amerikanske kongres´ 911 Commision-rapport gik i en del detaljer om dette, men i medierne blev det spinnet som om der INGEN forbindelse var (en grund til til altid at mistænke mainstream-medierne: de er notorisk dovne og gider ikke dobbelttjekke det de får fra de internationale telegram-bureauer). The Weekly Standard har mere, og lægger ud med konklusionerne angående en indsat på Guantanamo:


1. From 1987 to 1989, the detainee served as an infantryman in the Iraqi Army and received training on the mortar and rocket propelled grenades.
2. A Taliban recruiter in Baghdad convinced the detainee to travel to Afghanistan to
join the Taliban in 1994. ..
9. An assistant to Usama Bin Ladin paid the detainee on three separate occasions between 1995 and 1997. ..
11. From 1997 to 1998, the detainee acted as a trusted agent for Usama Bin Ladin, executing three separate reconnaissance missions for the al Qaeda leader in Oman, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
12. In August 1998, the detainee traveled to Pakistan with a member of Iraqi Intelligence for the purpose of blowing up the Pakistan, United States and British embassies with chemical mortars. ..

Interesting. What's more interesting: The alleged plot was to have taken place in August 1998, the same month that al Qaeda attacked two U.S. embassies in East Africa. And more interesting still: It was to have taken place in the same month that the Clinton administration publicly accused Iraq of supplying al Qaeda with chemical weapons expertise and material.

But none of this was interesting enough for any of the major television networks to cover it. Nor was it deemed sufficiently newsworthy to merit a mention in either the Washington Post or the New York Times.

The Associated Press, on the other hand, probably felt obliged to run a story, since the "Summary of Evidence" was released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the AP itself. But after briefly describing the documents, the AP article downplayed its own scoop with a sentence almost as amusing as it is inane: "There is no indication the Iraqi's alleged terror-related activities were on behalf of Saddam Hussein's government, other than the brief mention of him traveling to Pakistan with a member of Iraqi intelligence." That sentence minimizing the importance of the findings was enough, apparently, to convince most newspaper editors around the country not to run the AP story. ..

We know about this relationship not from Bush administration assertions but from internal Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) documents recovered in Iraq after the war--documents that have been authenticated by a U.S. intelligence community long hostile to the very idea that any such relationship exists.

We know from these IIS documents that beginning in 1992 the former Iraqi regime regarded bin Laden as an Iraqi Intelligence asset. We know from IIS documents that the former Iraqi regime provided safe haven and financial support to an Iraqi who has admitted to mixing the chemicals for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. We know from IIS documents that Saddam Hussein agreed to Osama bin Laden's request to broadcast anti-Saudi propaganda on Iraqi state-run television. We know from IIS documents that a "trusted confidante" of bin Laden stayed for more than two weeks at a posh Baghdad hotel as the guest of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

We have been told by Hudayfa Azzam, the son of bin Laden's longtime mentor Abdullah Azzam, that Saddam Hussein welcomed young al Qaeda members "with open arms" before the war, that they "entered Iraq in large numbers, setting up an organization to confront the occupation," and that the regime "strictly and directly" controlled their activities. We have been told by Jordan's King Abdullah that his government knew Abu Musab al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and requested that the former Iraqi regime deport him. We have been told by Time magazine that confidential documents from Zarqawi's group, recovered in recent raids, indicate other jihadists had joined him in Baghdad before the Hussein regime fell. We have been told by one of those jihadists that he was with Zarqawi in Baghdad before the war. We have been told by Ayad Allawi, former Iraqi prime minister and a longtime CIA source, that other Iraqi Intelligence documents indicate bin Laden's top deputy was in Iraq for a jihadist conference in September 1999.

Læg Saddams betaling til Palæstinensiske familier for at sende deres sønner ind i Israel for at dræbe og lemlæste uskyldige børn, kvinder og mænd, og vi begynder at få et nogenlunde dækkende billede.


Alligevel får vi konstante serveret parti-linjen om at der ingen forbindelser var mellem Irak og al Qaeda.

Henrik

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonym said...

Det lykkedes danske medier helt at ignorere det faktum at Hussein-regimet i årevis havde kontakt med islamistiske terrorister.

Kontakterne gør ikke Saddam Hussein til bagmand for noget som helst, men indikerer at han slet ikke fortjener den goodwill han nu får af forskere/kommentatorer/oppositionspolitikere.

http://www.uriasposten.net/files/Saddamogterrorismen.htm

3:07 PM  

Send en kommentar

<< Home